Big Tech asked the Supreme Court to continue affirmative action


Big tech companies led by Apple and Google asked the Supreme Court on Monday to block affirmative action, saying the companies require racial diversity in hiring.

They were among about 70 companies in the technology, financial and healthcare industries to file claims in one of the high court’s most high-profile cases of the next term.

The legal battle involves Harvard University and the University of North Carolina for violating the Constitution and discriminating against Asian American applicants. The judges are asked to take positive action.

“Different human resources will improve […] Business performance – and strengthens the US and global economies. [The companies] Look for employees who are educated at universities and exposed to a wide range of life experiences and perspectives and who can bring diverse perspectives and experiences to the workplace,” the 47-page brief read.

Some of the other major companies that signed this brief include Airbnb, American Airlines, American Express, Dell Technologies, Johnson & Johnson, Mattel, PayPal, Meta Platforms, Starbucks, The Hershey Company, The Kraft Heinz Company, Uber, United Airlines. And they include. Walgreens Boots Alliance.

They argued that schools should be able to admit students based on race to promote diversity.

“Some of the largest companies in America—now the government—still argue to this court that the desire to promote student-body diversity on university campuses is commercially attractive.

The defenders of the universities In 1978, in Regents of the University of California, the Supreme Court ruled that racial quotas were illegal, but that considering race as a factor in admissions was constitutional.

Subsequently, the Supreme Court decided Gruther v. Bollinger in 2003 and Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin in 2016, which held that affirmative action policies were not unconstitutional.

Students for Fair Admissions have argued against the use of race when evaluating applications that discriminate against Asian Americans accepted by a large number of top colleges in a race-blind, test-score-based system.

“Harvard’s treatment of Asian-American applicants is appalling. Harvard punishes them because, according to the admissions office, they lack leadership and self-confidence and are less likable and kind, the group wrote in court filings.

Although no date has been set for oral arguments, the case is set to be argued during the court’s next term, which begins in October.

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson said during her confirmation hearing that she had planned to recuse herself from the case since she became a member of Harvard’s board of trustees.

The high court originally planned to hear the legal battle with another affirmative action dispute involving the University of North Carolina, but in a recent order, Judge Jackson allowed them to weigh in on UNC’s dispute. Reports.

The cases are Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows at Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. They are from the University of North Carolina.





Source link

Related posts

Leave a Comment

nineteen − seven =